. Bericht über die Pittsburgh Transport Problem, vorgelegt an ehrenvolle William A. Magee, Bürgermeister der Stadt Pittsburgh . HINWEIS 1 BOPUTFTTION GEZEIGT ONI NICHT ENTHALTEN TERMINAL.LAT10N VON PITTSBURGH DOWN-STRICT 1634-1 . VERTEILUNG DER JÄHRLICHEN PASSAGIER . Die Passagiereinnahmen für das Jahr 1906 wurden von Ford, Bacon & here grafisch verteilt. Diese Karte zeigt die Bedeutung der Berücksichtigung, nicht nur tei Bindungen notwendig für jeden Bezirk. Auf den Außenlinien, alle Population in der Ferne! Die Pro-Kopf-Einkommen variierten im Jahr 1906 von 2.33 auf 28.01 US-Dollar, durchschnittlich etwa 11 US-Dollar.i jj^plNVMii. -9/> (j
2436 x 1026 px | 41,2 x 17,4 cm | 16,2 x 6,8 inches | 150dpi
Weitere Informationen:
Dieses Bild kann kleinere Mängel aufweisen, da es sich um ein historisches Bild oder ein Reportagebild handel
. Report on the Pittsburgh transportation problem, submitted to Honorable William A. Magee, mayor of the city of Pittsburgh . NOTE1 BOPUtftTION SHOWN ONi NOT INCLUDE TERMINAL.LAT10N OF PITTSBURGH DOWN-STRICT 1634-1 . DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL PASSENGER . The passenger earnings for the year 1906 were distributed by Ford, Bacon & here graphically. This map indicates the importance of considering, not only thei ties necessary for any district. On outlying lines, all population within a distance! ings per capita varied in 1906 from $2.33 to $28.01, averaging approximately $11.i jj^plNVMii. -9/> (jytArlA TWp r v tNw/-fWp -o The base of each rectangleis proportional to population, the height to annual earn-ings per capita of each dis-trict outlined, and the areato the total earnings per year. The various areas were out-lined as those territories trib-utary to the various sectionof line indicated by arrowsin the destination chart. •a-», , _, 1/jlL.KINS REPRODUCTION SCALE a woo 5000 3CALE OT MAP <• I I I I I I $200000 $00000 $50000 $10000. LEGEND BASE OF RECTANGLE. =PORULATION ALTITUDE. =EARNGSPERCAPITA AREA = TOTALEARNING3 tylUVJOZ3Ul/G) ILL sj!-nisk ANNUAL EARNINGS BY DISTRICT PER CAPITA BASIS BION J ARNOLDOn THEPITTSBURGH TRACTION PROBLEMTO HON.WILLIAM A.MAGEEMAYOR OF PITTSBURGH !E EARNINGS—PITTSBURGH AND VICINITY. jDavis, according to a destination count made by them, and the results are showntie population but also the relative riding habit in studying the transportation facili-ice of 1^ miles on either side of the line is considered tributary to them. The earn-1, 00 for the entire district. TRACTION RESULTS IN LARGESTAMERICAN CITIES COMPARED WITHPITTSBURGH Presenting in comparative form the fundamental data necessary toreach conclusions as to the character and extent ofservice rendered in Pittsburgh—Comparative financialrecords, showing the money earned and put back into service—Taxes, rittsourgh low Depreciation—Annual earnings from opera-tion Ratio, expens
